r/WritingWithAI weekly
Use only inside the Weekly Tool Thread; target replies about rights, labels, and upload friction.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-rd-01
Open writer upload kit
Use this kit for writer-native outreach, not a broad reader blast. The offer is a rights-first 1-3 chapter pilot shelf with transparent AI labels and human community feedback.
Post in one allowed thread at a time. Do not DM writers, do not cross-post the same copy, and treat Royal Road/Scribble Hub as feedback channels unless their rules clearly allow a link.
Use only inside the Weekly Tool Thread; target replies about rights, labels, and upload friction.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-rd-01
Use for story-method feedback, not product promotion; attach an AI Method disclosure.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-rbr-01
Prefer a link-light policy question first; include this measured link only if the thread fit is clear.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-sh-01
Ask about disclosure, rights, and mirror-pilot resistance. Avoid Promote Your Fiction for offsite links.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/en/founding-shelf?utm_source=royalroad&utm_medium=forum_question&utm_campaign=writer_upload_beta
I’m building Plotloom, a small web-first beta shelf for human-led, clearly labeled AI-assisted serial fiction. It is not an AI writing generator or raw text dump. The goal is to help early writers publish a short 1-3 chapter pilot, disclose how AI was used, and collect human feedback without pretending the workflow was fully human. I’m looking for feedback from writers who already use AI for outlining, editing, translation, drafting support, or cover/story development. Questions: 1. Would you mirror a short pilot on a separate AI-labeled fiction shelf? 2. What rights/privacy language would you need before submitting? 3. Would detailed process labels reduce stigma? 4. What would make upload friction worth it? Authors keep their rights. Publishing is non-exclusive. Manuscripts are not used for AI training without explicit consent. https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-rd-01
NSFW? No Genre tags: web serial / AI-assisted fiction / feedback request AI Method: Human-led story. AI was used for outline expansion and editing suggestions. Final structure, character decisions, and final prose edit were done by the author. Desired feedback: 1. Does this AI Method disclosure feel clear or too vague? 2. Would this make you more or less willing to read? 3. For a 3-chapter pilot, what would you need by the end of chapter 1 to continue? 4. Would you ever mirror a short pilot on a separate AI-labeled fiction shelf if rights remain with the author and publishing is non-exclusive? https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-rbr-01
Question for serial fiction authors: For writers who use AI only as part of the workflow, such as outlining, editing, translation help, or cover ideation, what kind of disclosure would feel fair to readers? I’m not talking about mostly AI-written stories. I’m asking about human-led stories where AI is one tool in the process. Would you prefer one broad “AI-assisted” label, detailed process labels, a short author note, or no label unless AI wrote substantial prose? Also, would you ever mirror a 1-3 chapter pilot on a separate feedback shelf if rights remain with the author, publishing is non-exclusive, the author can request removal, and AI usage is disclosed clearly?
I stopped thinking about app stores and started testing writer activation for a fiction web app. Plotloom is a web-based fiction community for short serial tests and transparent AI labels. The current bottleneck is not iOS/Android distribution; it is whether early writers trust open signup, rights summary, and label model enough to upload. I’d appreciate feedback on the growth path: should the landing speak to writers first, is “AI-labeled fiction” clearer than “AI fiction,” and what would you measure in the first two weeks? https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/en/feedback?utm_source=product_hunt&utm_medium=feedback&utm_campaign=writer_upload_beta
UTM
Use as the generic writer upload/trust guide when no channel-specific /go code exists.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/en/founding-shelf?utm_source=sharekit&utm_medium=writer_outreach&utm_campaign=writer_upload_beta
Main English writer-acquisition link for the weekly tool thread.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-rd-01
Use when asking for AI Method and Chapter 1 feedback.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-rbr-01
Measured link for a permitted forum feedback post; otherwise ask link-free first.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-sh-01
Use for HN/Product Hunt/Indie Hackers feedback when asking about onboarding and trust.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/en/feedback?utm_source=sharekit&utm_medium=feedback&utm_campaign=writer_upload_beta
Use only when a writer or feedback thread asks to inspect the reading experience.
https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/en/stories/dead-reader-highlights?utm_source=sharekit&utm_medium=proof_sample&utm_campaign=writer_upload_beta
Distribution
Show HN: Plotloom, an AI-labeled fiction shelf for short serial tests I built Plotloom, a small web-based fiction beta shelf. It is designed around a question I kept running into: if AI-assisted fiction is going to exist, what would a transparent, reader-facing label system look like? The current beta supports public reading without signup, open writer signup, short serial fiction, Korean and English, community reactions, and visible AI labels. Feedback welcome, especially on the label system and first-writer onboarding. https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/en/founding-shelf?utm_source=sharekit&utm_medium=writer_outreach&utm_campaign=writer_upload_beta
Feedback wanted: a small beta shelf for short serial tests with transparent AI labels I’m working on a small fiction platform called Plotloom. The goal is not to replace Scribble Hub, Royal Road, or Wattpad. I’m testing a smaller idea: a short-form serial shelf where early writers can publish a few chapters, get feedback, and clearly label whether AI was used. I’d love feedback from serial writers on whether a 3-chapter test format makes sense, whether AI labels build trust or create immediate rejection, and what a new platform must show before you would consider uploading. https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/go/wup-en-sh-01
I stopped thinking about app stores and started testing writer activation for a fiction web app. Plotloom is a web-based fiction community for short serial tests and transparent AI labels. At first I wondered whether I should ship an iOS/Android app, but the real bottleneck is early writer activation. I’m testing a web-first flow: public reading without signup, open writer signup, lightweight community feedback, transparent AI labels, and short serial tests instead of huge publishing commitments. What would you measure in the first two weeks? https://plotloom-app.djwj5611.workers.dev/en/feedback?utm_source=product_hunt&utm_medium=feedback&utm_campaign=writer_upload_beta
Writer landing visits by source, especially wup-en-rd, wup-en-rbr, and wup-en-sh
Writer signup starts plus upload_support_submit events, not raw homepage visits
Signup/upload friction distribution: rights, AI training, stigma, visibility, first-upload burden
Studio entry, story creation, and actual sample/manuscript packet opens
Public comments that mention labels, rights, or upload resistance